A friend of mine recently wrote about how convenient the kindle is, a reading device provided by Amazon. After writing to his wall, he suggested I should go for one as well, given that I understand many of the contents provided bat kindle store.
I have to be honest here. Before I decided to go for an iPad more than half a year ago, I had to ask myself more than twice whether I should, or rather would like to go for kindle instead. A that time, I already had kindle.app installed on my iPhone and my MacBook Pro and knew what sort of contents were available. Eventually I decided to go for an iPad, because of number of the applications available for the iPad.
One of the reasons why I didn’t go for kindle, and why I still haven’t, is it’s response time. Looking at the introduction movie clips, it looks still very slow on it’s display, dispute the fact it’s been improved. Sure, it is human-eye friendly, but am I going to be able to endure e-ink’s rather slow response time? Although I still haven’t touched kindle myself, this fear hadn’t gone away, each time I touch an electric reading device, such as the ones from Sony.
When I look at myself, on the other hand, most of my iPad use is spent on reading purpose. Surprisingly, I still am reading news paper contents on Financial Times, using the provided application, ft.app. Tis is one of those moments when I think going for kindle might not have been such a bad choice after all.
Recently Apple has announced a new policy for those subscription applications such as ft.app. In response to this event, Financial Times has launched new HTML and JavaScript based application. I was already asked, or rather suggested to use www based application, although, after using the HTML5 version for a while, I still think the FT.app (on my iPad) is the best news-reading application I’ve found so far. I don’t think they would abandon the existing iPad application. But I would not be surprised if they apply extra charges for those uses who use iPad to read the news articles – I personally think they should actually apply such a plan. After all, it is a private company, which can decide its price (whether customer accepts that price is another question).
Another thing I have to think of is the network feature, enabled in the kindle reader. Currently I’m using WiFi version of iPad, so need to download the contents very morning before I get on the train. Of course going for 3G iPad was an option, but I wouldn’t have bought that one, even if I knew I would read ft contents on that device. It seems I still hate my life to become more complicated than it already is. For this matter, kindle seems to offer much more attractive option to customers, even though it also shows how much they would like their customers to read only those contents offered at kindle store, by not supporting ePUB format.
So going for kindle makes my life easier? Frankly speaking, I don’t know. iPad made my life already a bit complicated. I don’t even know if having kindle on top of iPad would be within my capacity reach.
My Financial Times subscription ends at the end of the year. Perhaps it would be a good tine to think about it again.
